Accessibility Statement

Our commitment to a web accessible to all.

Service provider

Name: Pangea Biofarm Srl
Type of entity: private entity
Website covered by this statement: https://pangeabiofarm.com

Legal references

The service provider is not among the entities subject to the obligations set out in Article 3 of Italian Law no. 4 of 9 January 2004, and publishes this statement on a voluntary basis. The template followed is the one provided by the AgID Guidelines on the accessibility of IT tools, adopted as a reference. The technical requirements used as a reference are those of standard EN 301 549, corresponding to the WCAG 2.1 success criteria at level AA.

Compliance status

This website is partially compliant with the requirements of standard EN 301 549 (WCAG 2.1 success criteria at level AA), adopted as a reference.

Reason: 1 non-compliant criterion was found, on 2 of the 24 pages analysed, for a total of 4 occurrences. 6 criteria are satisfied by means of the accessibility assistance widget: they are not counted among the non-compliances and are listed individually in this statement.

Option selected

b) Website partially compliant: some parts of the website are not fully compliant with the applicable requirements.

Assessment method

The assessment expressed in this statement results from the combination of three components: automated testing carried out with scanning software, manual testing performed by a person, and the accessibility assistance widget present on the website. None of the three, on its own, is sufficient to demonstrate compliance.

Compliance is assessed on the page as it is delivered to the user, therefore including the accessibility assistance widget: this is the reason why the criteria that rely on it are listed one by one, and not merged with those resolved in the code.

Automated testing by software

The data reported in this statement come from the scan carried out on 5 October 2026.

The website was analysed with scanning software on 24 pages, in a real browser, using the axe-core analysis engine version 4.12.1 together with additional checks on keyboard navigation, focus visibility, content reflow and text spacing. Automated testing identifies the non-compliances that can be detected by instruments, the warnings and the points that require human assessment; on its own it is not sufficient to demonstrate full compliance of the website.

The pages analysed are the following:

Manual testing by an operator

Manual testing was used to assess the criteria that cannot be decided automatically and to confirm or rule out the findings that require human judgement. As at the date of preparation, all 46 criteria that require a human assessment have been verified.

The decisions that affect this statement — in particular "compliant following manual testing" and "not applicable", which remove an item from the list of non-accessible content — are recorded in the management tool together with the reason given by the person who took them, the date and the name of the operator. Such personal data are not reported in this document, which is public, and remain available for consultation at the service provider.

Accessibility assistance widget

The website uses an accessibility assistance widget, which allows users to adjust contrast, text size, spacing, readability and other aspects of the interface. Some criteria are satisfied by means of this measure, where they fall among those on which the widget actually acts and where the related verification has been recorded: they are listed one by one in the dedicated section below, because the way in which compliance was achieved is part of what this document declares. The widget complements automated and manual testing and does not replace it.

Limits of the assessment

Of the 50 WCAG 2.1 success criteria at levels A and AA, 4 can be verified entirely automatically, 27 only in part and 19 necessarily require a human assessment: 46 criteria therefore require, in whole or in part, a human assessment. The absence of automated errors is not therefore equivalent to compliance: the manual testing has been carried out.

Non-accessible content

The testing carried out found the following content to be non-compliant:

Downloadable documents to be assessed separately — WCAG criteria 1.1.1, 1.3.1, medium severity, found on 2 pages (4 occurrences).

Compliance achieved by means of the accessibility assistance widget

For the criteria listed below, compliance is achieved by means of the accessibility assistance widget — which allows users to adjust contrast, text size, spacing, readability and other aspects of the interface — and not by direct correction of the code or the content. The method is described in the "Assessment method" section.

Sienna accessibility widget by Abacus85 s.r.l.

Insufficient contrast between text and background — WCAG criterion 1.4.3.
The corresponding widget setting was tested on the pages concerned and covers the criterion.
Elements reachable by keyboard without a visible focus indicator — WCAG criterion 2.4.7.
The corresponding widget setting was tested on the pages concerned and covers the criterion.
Horizontal scrolling at 320 px width — WCAG criterion 1.4.10.
The corresponding widget setting was tested on the pages concerned and covers the criterion.
Text clipped when the required minimum spacing is applied — WCAG criterion 1.4.12.
The corresponding widget setting was tested on the pages concerned and covers the criterion.
Criterion 1.4.4 — Resize Text. The criterion is satisfied by means of the accessibility assistance widget.
Criterion 1.4.11 — Non-text Contrast. The criterion is satisfied by means of the accessibility assistance widget.

Content not accessible owing to disproportionate burden

The following content is among that already listed as non-accessible: it has not been corrected, and the reason is given below.

Downloadable documents to be assessed separately — WCAG criteria 1.1.1, 1.3.1, found on 2 pages.
Reason: The correction would require work whose cost is disproportionate to the expected benefit, assessed in relation to the size of the organisation and the frequency of use of the function concerned.

Preparation of this accessibility statement

This statement was prepared on 5 October 2026 on the basis of a self-assessment carried out by the service provider.

Methodology used. The assessment method — automated testing, manual testing and, where present, the accessibility assistance widget — is described in full in the "Assessment method" section, together with the limits of the assessment.

Feedback and contact information

Users can report any accessibility issues with this website using the contact details below.

Email address: info@pangeabiofarm.com

The service provider undertakes to reply within 30 days of the report.

Enforcement procedure

The service provider is not among those subject to supervision by the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) pursuant to Article 3(1-bis) of Italian Law no. 4 of 9 January 2004: no enforcement procedure before the Agency is therefore available for this website, nor recourse to the Digital Ombudsman (Difensore civico per il digitale).

The service provider nonetheless undertakes to respond to reports within 30 days and to indicate, where the issue cannot be resolved quickly, the expected timescale for the work and any accessible alternatives available.